Should the Builder Manage Your Building?
When a new apartment building is completed and handed over, one of the first major decisions facing the Owners Corporation is:
Who should manage the building?
A common industry practice is to engage the same construction company that built the property to also take on the building management or caretaker role. On the surface, this seems logical—and in many ways, it is.
However, there is an important and often overlooked issue at play:
conflict of interest.
The Situation at Handover
Once construction is complete, the building enters what is commonly known as the Defects Liability Period (DLP)—essentially a warranty period during which the builder is responsible for rectifying defects.
At this point, responsibility shifts to the Owners Corporation. They must now ensure the building is:
- Properly maintained
- Operating efficiently
- Protected as a long-term asset
To achieve this, they typically engage:
- A building manager
- Cleaning services
- Maintenance personnel
The goal is simple: preserve value, functionality, and presentation over time.
Why Engaging the Builder Seems Logical
There are several practical reasons why many committees choose the construction company for building management:
- They already understand the building’s design and systems
- They know the subcontractors and suppliers involved
- They have technical construction knowledge
- There is an existing working relationship
- They are familiar with compliance requirements
- They are assumed to be financially stable
- They likely have experience in similar projects
On paper, it makes sense—much like taking your car back to the dealership for servicing.
But this is where the issue begins.

The Core Problem: Conflict of Interest
The construction company has two competing interests:
- As the builder:
They are responsible for fixing defects under warranty. - As the building manager:
They are responsible for identifying and reporting those defects.
This creates a fundamental tension.
A company is unlikely to actively highlight issues that will cost them money to fix; especially when those issues stem from their own work.
This doesn’t necessarily come from bad intent, it’s simply human nature and commercial reality.
A Practical Example: Water Ingress
Imagine a newly completed building with beautifully tiled balconies.
After heavy rain, water begins leaking into the balcony below. Signs appear:
- Discolouration
- Peeling paint
- Rust marks
The root cause may be poor drainage or inadequate waterproofing.
The solution?
Potentially expensive and invasive works:
- Removing tiles
- Opening up the slab
- Reinstalling waterproofing
- Retiling multiple balconies
Now consider:
- Who identifies and reports the issue?
- Who pays for the repair?
If the builder is also the building manager, they are effectively being asked to report a defect that could cost them significant money.

[…] on property servicesso that is 24 x $45 = $1,080Now that employee could be working for the core business, so the employee performing non-core activities means another person in your organization is doing […]
[…] for the fridge, the directory of the database, much like that in your Laptop, serves to find the information and take the Building Manager to a new directory if […]
[…] always found a spreadsheet forces clarity. It’s where everything in your head gets pushed into something structured. Inputs, outputs, controller allocations, plant areas, all laid out so you can actually […]